cloudinit-bot
3746f03c58
The extraction-contract.md doc cited 4 line ranges in pipelines/common.py that drifted past the v1.0 + v1.1 line-shuffle (the v1.1 EXECUTE stage added ~70 lines to the LLM block: 30+ to LLMConfig.from_env and ~25 to _ollama_call_one_model, plus a reshape of opencode_run_command). This commit updates the 4 cites to the post-v1.1 line positions: - line 40: 467-468 → 545-546 (default_model / extract_model env defaults in LLMConfig.from_env) - line 98: 414-479 → 492-585 (LLMConfig class range) - line 102: 605-624 → 636-680 (_ollama_call_one_model function range) - line 161: 378-407 → 440-487 (opencode_run_command function range) The contract semantics (model pin, prompt path, JSON parse) are unchanged — only the line refs are updated. The surrounding prose is preserved verbatim. Verified: grep -n 'pipelines/common.py:' docs/extraction-contract.md shows the 4 new ranges and zero hits to the stale ranges (467-468, 414-479, 605-624, 378-407). ---ci--- project: inboxos phase: 1 milestone: v1.3 status: execute tasks_completed: [T2.4] candidates_closed: [REQ-INB-32] files_touched: - docs/extraction-contract.md (4 line-ref substrings replaced, lines 40, 98, 102, 161) ---/ci---
InboxOS
Self-hosted personal ERP / CRM pipeline. A single Gmail inbox, polled over IMAP, archived to SeaweedFS, classified and extracted by a local LLM (Ollama), and written to NocoDB as structured records. Curated attachments are mirrored to Papra. No third-party SaaS touches PII.
Where to start
- Operations runbook —
docs/operations-runbook.md. System overview, service inventory, workflow operations, observability, failure modes, security, cost, glossary. The first thing to read on day 1 of incident response. - Extraction contract —
docs/extraction-contract.md. How a raw email becomes a NocoDB record. Source of truth for theinboxos:classify+inboxos:extract-<module>prompt family. - NocoDB schema —
docs/schemas.md. The four module tables (finance,crm,intel,promotions) and the Message-ID idempotency contract. - Gitea Actions setup —
docs/gitea-actions.md. Runner provisioning (including the second runner for live + historical parallelism), repo secrets, the Basic Auth model. - Pipelines —
pipelines/README.md. Flow diagrams, idempotency model, rollback procedure for the live and historical pipelines. - Papra write policy —
docs/papra-write-policy.md. When the pipeline writes to Papra (attachments + selected bodies), and why the first ship is dry-run.
Quick layout
inboxos/
├── README.md # this file
├── .env.example # placeholder env (no real secrets)
├── docker/
│ └── docker-compose.yml # self-hosted stack: gitea, runners, nocodb, seaweedfs, papra, ollama
├── .gitea/workflows/
│ ├── live-pipeline.yml # cron */5 * * * *, polls IMAP
│ ├── historical-pipeline.yml # workflow_dispatch, streams .mbox
│ └── ci-pr.yml # fast-tests + 100MB e2e + live Ollama smoke
├── pipelines/ # shared Python: common.py, live_pipeline.py, historical_pipeline.py, mbox_stream.py
├── .opencode/commands/ # version-controlled extraction prompts (prompt-as-code)
├── config/ # n8n config (legacy, no longer in use)
└── docs/ # this runbook + schemas + contracts + reports
Status
Phase 5 — Full Deployment. Parent goal: INB-1. Current phase issue: INB-7. The runbook in docs/operations-runbook.md is the canonical reference for ongoing operation.
Historical archive (Google Takeout .mbox)
The full Google Takeout .mbox export lives in SeaweedFS at the canonical S3 URI:
s3://inboxos/eml/historical/all-mail.mbox
That is the value to pass as the mbox_object_key workflow_dispatch input to historical-pipeline.yml. To verify it exists, run from any host with mc configured against the inboxos bucket:
mc ls --recursive inboxos/inboxos/ | grep '\.mbox$'
The historical pipeline streams this object message-by-message, UPSERTs each into NocoDB on Message-ID, and writes the raw .eml backup under s3://inboxos/eml/historical/<yyyy>/<mm>/<dd>/<Message-ID>.eml. See docs/operations-runbook.md §3.2 for the dispatch recipe and §4.4 for the full bucket layout.