v1.2.0 63c0f59ad1

InboxOS v1.2.0 — 0/1 disposition (audit trail only) Stable

cloudinit-bot released this 2026-06-09 10:12:27 +00:00 | 56 commits to main since this release

InboxOS v1.2.0

Released: 2026-06-08
Tag: v1.2.0
Milestone branch: milestone/v1.2-initial
Base: v1.1.0 (no source-tree changes)

Summary

InboxOS v1.2.0 closes on a 0/1 disposition (0 candidates accepted
for inboxos execution, 1 candidate rejected as out-of-domain). The
single Gitea issue assigned to cloudinit-bot (INB-183, the
opencode-local adapter $HOME/.local/bin PATH append) targets the
opencode monorepo (paperclip/), not inboxos. A polite-rejection
comment was posted to INB-183 on 2026-06-08 pointing the issue at
the upstream executor (opencode monorepo maintainer), where the fix
is a real 5-minute change.

v1.2.0 is a no-feature delta over v1.1.0. No inboxos code, test,
schema, or doc files were modified in this milestone. The v1.2
deliverable is the audit trail recording the 0/1 disposition and the
Gitea rejection comment.

Disposition

Candidate	Status	Rationale
REQ-INB-26	`[REJECTED — out of domain]`	Fix target is the opencode monorepo (`paperclip/packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.ts:255`), not inboxos. The inboxos bot's domain is `pipelines/`, `docker/`, `.gitea/workflows/`, `docs/`, and `.opencode/commands/` only.
(none other)	n/a	v1.2 ideation produced 1 candidate, which was rejected. No other candidates were considered.

Disposition action

A polite-rejection comment was posted to INB-183 via
tea comment 8 -r jc-capital/inboxos on 2026-06-08 22:26. The comment:

Acknowledges the spec is clear and the acceptance criteria are tight
(no criticism of the issue author).
Declines the work on the inboxos side, naming the cross-repo nature
of the fix as the reason.
Explains why a cross-project handoff (registering paperclip as a
sibling project) was rejected: it would expand the bot's scope
across repo boundaries without a clear executor and muddy ownership
for future audits.
States the inboxos disposition: 0 candidates accepted for v1.2
inboxos execution, 1 candidate rejected as out-of-domain, no inboxos
code/test/docs changed for this issue.
Suggests the next step: re-target the issue to whichever bot or
maintainer owns the opencode monorepo, where the upstream
defaultPathForPlatform change + CHANGELOG.md note is a real
5-minute fix.

Commit chain (milestone/v1.2-initial)

63c0f59 docs(milestone): complete v1.2 (InboxOS 0/1 disposition — REQ-INB-26 rejected as out-of-domain)
275570d docs(audit): v1.2 milestone audit PASS (5 commits, 24/24 ---ci--- blocks, file/commit discipline clean)
68c7ed0 docs(review): v1.2 multi-persona code review PASS (audit-trail only, 0 source-tree changes)
54f59ff docs(verify): v1.2 phase 1 verification PASS (4 layers, 0 must-haves, 0/1 disposition, high confidence)
5b51dc1 chore(execute): v1.2 phase 1 — no tasks (all candidates rejected; see REQ-INB-26)
8e10c22 docs(plan): v1.2 phase 1 plans (0 candidates — empty set, REQ-INB-26 rejected)
7151c19 fix(ideate): REQ-INB-26 REJECTED (out of domain — paperclip monorepo); posted tea comment on INB-183
b0f099b docs(ideate): v1.2 candidate ideas (1 from Gitea — REQ-INB-26 / INB-183)

Files changed (audit trail only)

+ .ciagent/inboxos/ideation/v1.2-candidates.md (new, 8 sections, 379 lines)
+ .ciagent/inboxos/plans/01-PLAN-v1.2.md (new, empty-candidate plan)
+ .ciagent/inboxos/verify/v1.2-PHASE1-REPORT.md (new, 4-layer PASS)
~ .ciagent/inboxos/REQUIREMENTS.md (v1.2 section annotated with milestone close)
~ .ciagent/inboxos/ROADMAP.md (v1.2 ideation block marked [executed 2026-06-08 — 0/1 disposition])
~ .ciagent/inboxos/CI-LOG.md (v1.2 section appended)

No code, test, schema, or doc files in pipelines/, docker/,
.gitea/workflows/, docs/, or .opencode/commands/ were modified.

Ship pattern (per v1.0 and v1.1 precedent)

FF-merge from milestone/v1.2-initial to main: local ✅, remote pending admin push
Tag v1.2.0 created locally ✅, push to remote pending
Milestone branch milestone/v1.2-initial push to remote pending
Gitea release for v1.2.0 created via tea releases create (this release)

Operators with admin push rights (e.g. via a CI bot PAT with bypass)
can land the FF on remote main; this repo's cloudinit-bot token
does not have that scope, so main remains at the v1.1.0 baseline
locally until the admin push. The local v1.2 chain is on
milestone/v1.2-initial (locally FF-merged to main) and the
v1.2.0 tag is on main (63c0f59).

Lessons learned

L-IDEATE-01: A single-issue directed ideation pass where the
only assigned issue is cross-project is a trap — the mechanical
translation produces a well-formed candidate that the disposition
layer has to reject. The disposition layer needs an explicit
"out-of-domain" path separate from the standard accept/skip/modify
loop.
L-IDEATE-02: The cross-project meta-finding ("register
paperclip as a sibling project?") is a precondition question, not
a candidate. The lead-developer should resolve it during the IDEATE
pass, not during PLAN.
L-DISP-01: A polite-rejection comment on the originating Gitea
issue is a required disposition action for out-of-domain work, not
an optional nicety. The issue author needs the rejection to be
visible in the same thread where they filed the issue.
L-PLAN-01: An empty plan is a valid plan output. The PLAN file
is the audit record of "the planner considered the candidate set,
found no work, and is shipping the empty plan." This is the same
disposition pattern as an NFR milestone with all fix/chore phases.

Downloads

3 Releases 4 Tags