Compare commits

...

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jon Chery b3c75ccec1 Merge phase/02-pdlc-scope-raci — v1.17.2 (v1.18 P2 PDLC scope + RACI complete) 2026-08-06 15:07:14 +00:00
Jon Chery e891496163 docs(P2): PDLC-upstream scope + RACI matrix + 2 deck slides (REQ-215, REQ-216, REQ-228)
REQ-215: RACI matrix in PROJECT.md (§ RACI Matrix) + docs/raci.md
(citizen-dev-facing copy). 3 roles (Citizen Developer / Platform / Release
Management co-owned). 7 work categories × R/A/C/I. Compliance-standard
equivalence note: any upstream source (AI agent, SDLC, dev platform) is
subject to the same gate.

REQ-216: PDLC-upstream scope in PROJECT.md (§ Scope) + docs/scope.md.
Promotes Core Tenet #2 + Anti-Goal #1 from buried tenets to a dedicated,
unmissable scope statement.

REQ-228: 2 new deck slides (17 Scope + 18 RACI) → 20 slides. Arc preview
updated. Talking points synced. HTML + PPTX re-rendered (21 PPTX slides).

---ci---
project: acdl
phase: 2
milestone: v1.18
status: execute
requirements:
  covered: [REQ-215, REQ-216, REQ-228]
  partial: []
---/ci---
2026-08-06 15:07:10 +00:00
Jon Chery 382944c055 Merge phase/01-sp-theme-restoration — v1.17.1 (v1.18 P1 S&P theme restoration + PPTX automation complete) 2026-08-06 15:05:09 +00:00
Jon Chery 71b6a4fa91 feat(P1): restore S&P Global Energy theme + PPTX automation (REQ-214, REQ-228)
REQ-214: Restore the S&P Global Energy Marp style: block (from commit
ae0cb58 / v1.9.2 P45) to the unified deck. Colors: H1/H2 #D6002A (red-core),
title-slide bg #1B1B1B (grey-90) + 8px #D6002A top accent, body #1B1B1B,
blockquote border #D6002A, table headers #F0F0F0, font 'Akkurat Pro' with
web-safe fallbacks. Nova header/footer text preserved (rebrand not touched).
HTML re-rendered (229 S&P color refs confirmed).

REQ-228: scripts/render_deck.sh (HTML + PPTX render + git add) +
scripts/attach_release_asset.py (Gitea release asset upload via API). PPTX
is now a first-class committed binary (D-141, no LFS). README updated:
'PPTX not committed' → 'PPTX committed + attached'. PPTX committed (3.6 MiB,
19 slides).

---ci---
project: acdl
phase: 1
milestone: v1.18
status: execute
requirements:
  covered: [REQ-214, REQ-228]
  partial: []
---/ci---
2026-08-06 15:05:01 +00:00
11 changed files with 1364 additions and 300 deletions
+5 -3
View File
@@ -1,10 +1,12 @@
{
"phase": 0,
"stage": "plan",
"stage": "complete",
"milestone": "v1.18",
"phase_role": "pre_execution",
"attempts": 0,
"updated_at": "2026-08-06T00:25:00Z",
"updated_at": "2026-08-06T00:35:00Z",
"milestone_complete": false,
"notes": "v1.18 PLAN complete. 8 phases, 6 waves, 15 requirements. Sequential execution."
"tag": "v1.17.0",
"release_id": 522,
"notes": "v1.18 P0 complete. 5 pre-execution stages done. Tag v1.17.0, release 522."
}
+97
View File
@@ -58,6 +58,103 @@ traceable to a human attestation and an immutable evidence stream.
boundary. The platform validates, enriches with operational standards,
and reconciles the target state.
## Scope: Nova is Downstream of PDLC
> **Promoted from Core Tenet #2 + Anti-Goal #1 (v1.18, REQ-216).** This
> is the unmissable scope statement — the PDLC is upstream, Nova is
> downstream.
The **Product Development Lifecycle (PDLC)** — product backlog, code
authorship, IDE workflows, sprint planning, application business logic —
is **upstream** of Nova. Nova never penetrates the PDLC. Nova's domain is
**infrastructure + delivery only**: environment progression, cloud
resource lifecycle, operational security/observability NFRs, policy
enforcement, immutable audit lineage, and the two consumer surfaces
(technical developer + agentic).
Integration between the PDLC and Nova is **only** through the validated,
published contract boundary (`schemas/contract.schema.json` +
`schemas/submission-readiness.schema.json`). The citizen developer's AI
coding agent, an upstream agentic SDLC platform, or any upstream
development platform may all produce submissions — the source does not
matter because all are subject to the same compliance standards (the
submission-readiness gate, D-133). Nova validates, enriches with
operational standards, and reconciles the target state. Nova never
authors application code, manages product backlogs, or provides IDE
workflows.
```
PDLC (upstream) Nova (downstream)
───────────────── ─────────────────
product backlog contract ingestion
code authorship (AI agent / IDE / SDLC) → submission-readiness gate
sprint planning → policy enforcement
application business logic → cloud resource lifecycle
→ environment progression (dev→qa→prod→dr)
→ immutable audit + attestation
```
## RACI Matrix
> **Source of truth (v1.18, REQ-215, D-139).** Three roles clarify who
> owns what across the Nova delivery lifecycle. The matrix is the
> authoritative version; `docs/raci.md` is the citizen-developer-facing
> copy.
### Roles
- **Citizen Developer (CD)** — the consumer (technical developer L3A or
non-technical L3B). Responsible for all **Functional Requirements (FRs)**
and **User Acceptance Testing (UAT)**. The FRs + UAT are produced via
the citizen developer's AI coding agent, an upstream agentic SDLC, or
an upstream development platform — **the source does not matter as all
are subject to the same compliance standards** (the submission-readiness
gate, D-133).
- **Platform** — Nova. Responsible for all **Non-Functional Requirements
(NFRs)**, **Infrastructure** (cloud resource lifecycle, state, IAM),
**QA** (the platform-side quality checks: policy, confidence, schema),
and **Production deployments to cloud** (the apply path, the pipeline,
the release).
- **Release Management (RM)** — **co-owned**. QA + SRE attestations are
required by the actual release. The attestations are performed
agentically (the platform runs the checks), but the release is
**overseen and triggered by the Citizen Developer** — the human
attestation at the stage gate (D-042, hitl_gates.py). The platform
performs; the citizen developer authorizes.
### Matrix
| Work Category | Citizen Developer | Platform | Release Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| **Functional Requirements (FRs)** | **R/A** | C | I |
| **User Acceptance Testing (UAT)** | **R/A** | C | I |
| **Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs)** | I | **R/A** | C |
| **Infrastructure (cloud, state, IAM)** | I | **R/A** | C |
| **QA (policy, confidence, schema checks)** | C | **R/A** | I |
| **Production deployment to cloud** | I | **R/A** | C |
| **Release attestation (QA + SRE sign-off)** | **A** | R | **R** |
**Key: R** = Responsible (does the work) · **A** = Accountable (owns the
outcome, sign-off) · **C** = Consulted · **I** = Informed.
**Compliance-standard equivalence note:** the citizen developer's FRs +
UAT may originate from any upstream source — an AI coding agent, an
agentic SDLC platform, or a traditional development platform. All are
subject to the same compliance standards: the submission-readiness gate
(`schemas/submission-readiness.schema.json`), the contract schema, the
policy envelope, and the immutable audit stream. The platform does not
differentiate by upstream source; it validates the submission, not the
author.
**Co-ownership of Release Management:** the release is co-owned. The
platform performs the QA + SRE attestations agentically (confidence signal,
policy checks, separation-of-duties). The citizen developer oversees and
triggers the actual release — the human attestation at the stage gate is
the citizen developer's authorization, recorded with approver identity
(D-042). The platform runs the checks; the citizen developer authorizes
the promotion. This is the "autonomy in operations, human at stage gates"
model from the NORTH_STAR.
## Capability Status (Re-Verified 2026-07-27)
> Source of truth: `.ciagent/CAPABILITY_INVENTORY.md` (Phase 54, D-093).
+5 -3
View File
@@ -100,9 +100,11 @@ CHROME_PATH=/root/.cache/ms-playwright/chromium-1217/chrome-linux64/chrome \
```
The `--allow-local-files` flag is **required** for PPTX export so the local
PNG diagrams are embedded in the file. PPTX files are not committed to the
repo (binary, no meaningful diffs) — they are uploaded to the Gitea release
as downloadable attachments.
PNG diagrams are embedded in the file. As of v1.18 (REQ-228, D-141), PPTX
files **are committed to the repo** as first-class binary artifacts (no LFS)
and are also attached to the phase's Gitea release via
`scripts/attach_release_asset.py`. The render + commit + attach pipeline is
automated by `scripts/render_deck.sh`.
### Step 4 — Talking points (presenter cues)
@@ -6,13 +6,25 @@ size: 16x9
header: 'Nova — The No-Humans Infrastructure Platform'
footer: 'Act %{page}/5 — v1.17'
style: |
section { font-size: 0.85em; }
h1 { color: #1a1a2e; }
h2 { color: #16213e; }
table { font-size: 0.75em; }
.badge { padding: 2px 8px; border-radius: 3px; font-size: 0.8em; }
.badge.planned { background: #fff3cd; color: #856404; }
section.title { background: #1a1a2e; color: white; }
section {
font-family: "Akkurat Pro", "Helvetica Neue", "Arial", sans-serif;
font-size: 22px;
color: #1B1B1B;
}
h1 { color: #D6002A; font-size: 34px; margin-bottom: 0.3em; }
h2 { color: #D6002A; font-size: 26px; margin-bottom: 0.2em; }
section.title { background: #1B1B1B; color: #fff; border-top: 8px solid #D6002A; }
section.title h1 { color: #fff; }
table { font-size: 18px; width: 100%; }
th { background: #F0F0F0; }
blockquote { border-left: 4px solid #D6002A; color: #2E2E2E; font-size: 20px; }
img { display: block; margin: 0 auto; max-height: 320px; }
.badge {
display: inline-block; padding: 2px 8px; border-radius: 4px;
font-size: 14px; font-weight: 600;
}
.badge.today { background: #c6f6d5; color: #22543d; }
.badge.planned { background: #fef3c7; color: #78350f; }
---
<!-- _class: title -->
@@ -22,7 +34,7 @@ style: |
**Shifting from Operational Overhead to Strategic Value**
v1.17Strategic Direction, Leadership Metrics & Unified Story
v1.18Citizen Developer & Production-Grade Guidance
---
@@ -37,7 +49,7 @@ v1.17 — Strategic Direction, Leadership Metrics & Unified Story
2. **Vision** — Nova's strategic direction (NORTH_STAR)
3. **How** — the pipeline, Decision Ledger, attestation gates
4. **Proof** — grounded metrics that make the claim defensible
5. **Roadmap** — deferred metrics with unblock paths + the ask
5. **Roadmap** — deferred metrics with unblock paths + the ask + scope + RACI
**Benefit:** you leave knowing which claims are proven today, which are pipeline-ready, and which are deferred with a documented unblock path — no marketing, just grounded evidence.
@@ -289,6 +301,42 @@ From `docs/METRICS_DEFERRED_ROADMAP.md`.
---
## Slide 17 — Scope: Downstream of PDLC
**Nova governs infrastructure + delivery. The PDLC (product backlog, code authorship, IDE) is upstream — Nova never penetrates it.**
- **The PDLC is upstream:** product backlog, code authorship (AI agent / IDE / agentic SDLC), sprint planning, application business logic
- **Nova is downstream:** contract ingestion → submission-readiness gate → policy → cloud lifecycle → environment progression → audit + attestation
- **Integration is only through the contract boundary:** the citizen developer's AI coding agent, an upstream agentic SDLC, or any dev platform may all produce submissions — the source does not matter as all are subject to the same compliance standards
- Nova validates the submission, not the author
- Cites `docs/scope.md` + `PROJECT.md` § Scope
**Benefit:** you now know the scope boundary — Nova is purpose-built for infrastructure operations, not product development; integration is through one validated contract.
---
## Slide 18 — RACI: Who Owns What
**Three roles, one matrix — the citizen developer owns FRs + UAT, the platform owns NFRs + infra + QA + prod deploy, release management is co-owned.**
| Work Category | Citizen Dev | Platform | Release Mgmt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Requirements (FRs) | **R/A** | C | I |
| User Acceptance Testing (UAT) | **R/A** | C | I |
| Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs) | I | **R/A** | C |
| Infrastructure (cloud, state, IAM) | I | **R/A** | C |
| QA (policy, confidence, schema) | C | **R/A** | I |
| Production deployment to cloud | I | **R/A** | C |
| Release attestation (QA + SRE) | **A** | R | **R** |
- **Compliance-standard equivalence:** FRs + UAT may come from any upstream source (AI agent, agentic SDLC, dev platform) — all pass the same submission-readiness gate
- **Release co-ownership:** the platform runs the attestations agentically; the citizen developer oversees and triggers the actual release (human at the stage gate)
- Cites `docs/raci.md` + `PROJECT.md` § RACI Matrix
**Benefit:** you now know exactly what you bring (FRs + UAT), what Nova provides (NFRs + infra + QA + prod deploy), and what you co-own (the release attestation).
---
<!-- _class: title -->
<!-- _paginate: false -->
@@ -103,6 +103,20 @@
- "Pipeline-ready" → "production-proven" is the value proposition
- **Key takeaway:** approve a pilot + the ledger build-out to move from pipeline-ready to production-proven
### Slide 17 — Scope: Downstream of PDLC
- Nova governs infra + delivery only; the PDLC (product backlog, code authorship, IDE) is upstream
- Integration is only through the validated contract boundary
- Any upstream source (AI agent, agentic SDLC, dev platform) may produce submissions — all subject to the same compliance standards
- Nova validates the submission, not the author
- **Key takeaway:** Nova is purpose-built for infrastructure operations, not product development; the scope boundary is clean
### Slide 18 — RACI: Who Owns What
- Citizen Developer owns FRs + UAT (via any upstream source — AI agent, SDLC, dev platform — all pass the same gate)
- Platform owns NFRs + infra + QA + prod deploy
- Release Management is co-owned: platform runs attestations agentically, citizen developer oversees + triggers the release (human at stage gate)
- The compliance-standard equivalence is the key: the source does not matter; the submission does
- **Key takeaway:** you bring FRs + UAT; Nova provides NFRs + infra + QA + prod deploy; the release is co-owned with you at the stage gate
### Appendix A1 — Metrics Glossary
- Reference for every metric mentioned in the deck
- Use if the audience asks "what does X mean?"
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
Binary file not shown.
+85
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
# RACI — Who Owns What
> **Source of truth:** `.ciagent/PROJECT.md` § RACI Matrix (v1.18, REQ-215,
> D-139). This page is the citizen-developer-facing copy.
Nova's delivery lifecycle has three roles. This page clarifies who owns
what — so the citizen developer knows what they bring, what the platform
provides, and what is co-owned.
## The Three Roles
### Citizen Developer (CD)
That's you — the consumer (technical developer L3A or non-technical L3B).
You are **Responsible** for all **Functional Requirements (FRs)** and
**User Acceptance Testing (UAT)**. You produce the FRs + UAT via your AI
coding agent, an upstream agentic SDLC platform, or any upstream
development platform. **The source does not matter** — all are subject
to the same compliance standards (the submission-readiness gate, the
contract schema, the policy envelope, the immutable audit stream). Nova
validates the submission, not the author.
### Platform (Nova)
Nova is **Responsible** for all **Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs)**,
**Infrastructure** (cloud resource lifecycle, state, IAM), **QA** (the
platform-side quality checks: policy enforcement, confidence scoring,
schema validation), and **Production deployments to cloud** (the apply
path, the pipeline, the release mechanics).
### Release Management (RM) — co-owned
The release is **co-owned**. The platform performs the QA + SRE
attestations agentically (it runs the confidence signal, the policy
checks, the separation-of-duties). The citizen developer **oversees and
triggers** the actual release — the human attestation at the stage gate
is your authorization. The platform runs the checks; you authorize the
promotion. This is the "autonomy in operations, human at stage gates"
model.
## The Matrix
| Work Category | Citizen Developer | Platform | Release Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| **Functional Requirements (FRs)** | **R/A** | C | I |
| **User Acceptance Testing (UAT)** | **R/A** | C | I |
| **Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs)** | I | **R/A** | C |
| **Infrastructure (cloud, state, IAM)** | I | **R/A** | C |
| **QA (policy, confidence, schema checks)** | C | **R/A** | I |
| **Production deployment to cloud** | I | **R/A** | C |
| **Release attestation (QA + SRE sign-off)** | **A** | R | **R** |
**Key:** **R** = Responsible (does the work) · **A** = Accountable (owns
the outcome, sign-off) · **C** = Consulted · **I** = Informed.
## What This Means in Practice
**You (Citizen Developer) bring:**
- Your application code + a contract that declares intent.
- Your FRs (what the application does).
- Your UAT (you accept the deployment when it meets your FRs).
**Nova (Platform) provides:**
- The NFRs (security, observability, compliance — baked into the
pipeline, not your concern).
- The infrastructure (cloud resources, state management, IAM scoping).
- The QA (policy enforcement, confidence scoring, schema validation).
- The production deployment (the apply path, the pipeline, the release).
**You co-own the release:**
- Nova runs the attestations (QA confidence, SRE operational readiness).
- You authorize the promotion at the stage gate. No promotion happens
without your recorded attestation.
## Compliance Standards Apply Equally
Your FRs + UAT may come from any source — an AI coding agent, an
agentic SDLC platform, or a traditional IDE. Nova does not
differentiate. All submissions pass through the same gate
(`schemas/submission-readiness.schema.json`): tags, environment
metadata, policy preconditions, profile markers. The compliance
standards are the same regardless of how the code was authored. This
is by design: the audit trail is the same, the policy envelope is the
same, the evidence stream is the same. The source does not matter; the
submission does.
+68
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
# Scope — Nova is Downstream of PDLC
> **Source of truth:** `.ciagent/PROJECT.md` § Scope (v1.18, REQ-216).
> This page is the citizen-developer-facing copy.
## The Boundary
The **Product Development Lifecycle (PDLC)** is **upstream** of Nova. The
PDLC includes:
- Product backlog / roadmap planning
- Code authorship (via AI coding agent, IDE, or agentic SDLC platform)
- Sprint planning / issue tracking
- Application business logic
- IDE workflows / developer experience
Nova never penetrates the PDLC. Nova's domain is **infrastructure +
delivery only**.
## What Nova Does
Nova governs the downstream half:
- **Contract ingestion** — the validated entry point
- **Submission-readiness gate** — what is acceptable to start
(`schemas/submission-readiness.schema.json`)
- **Policy enforcement** — the confidence signal, Checkov, tagging
- **Cloud resource lifecycle** — Terraform plan/apply, state, IAM
- **Environment progression** — dev (autonomous) → qa (QA attestation) →
prod (SRE attestation) → dr (SRE attestation)
- **Immutable audit + attestation** — the Decision Ledger, the evidence
stream, the HITL gates
## The Integration Point
Integration between the PDLC and Nova is **only** through the validated,
published contract boundary:
```
PDLC (upstream) Nova (downstream)
───────────────── ─────────────────
product backlog contract ingestion
code authorship (AI agent / IDE / SDLC) → submission-readiness gate
sprint planning → policy enforcement
application business logic → cloud resource lifecycle
→ environment progression (dev→qa→prod→dr)
→ immutable audit + attestation
```
The citizen developer's AI coding agent, an upstream agentic SDLC
platform, or any upstream development platform may all produce
submissions. **The source does not matter** — all are subject to the
same compliance standards. Nova validates the submission, not the
author.
## What Nova is Not
- Not an upstream development platform (no product backlogs, IDE, code
authorship).
- Not a general-purpose AI agent platform (autonomy is narrow, bounded
by policy envelopes).
- Not a legacy infrastructure bridge (no VMs/bare metal/OS).
- Not a permissive delivery highway (no escape hatches past confidence
or HITL).
- Not a mutable audit log (VCS history ≠ regulatory evidence).
These anti-goals (from `docs/vision.md` §7 and Core Tenet #2) are
promoted here from buried tenets to an unmissable scope statement.
+80
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""scripts/attach_release_asset.py — upload a file as a Gitea release attachment.
REQ-228 (v1.18): PPTX (and any deck artifact) is attached to the phase's
Gitea release. Uses the Gitea API:
POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/releases/{id}/assets
multipart form: name=<filename>, attachment=<file bytes>
Usage:
python3 scripts/attach_release_asset.py <file-path> <release-id>
python3 scripts/attach_release_asset.py docs/presentations/nova-no-humans-platform.pptx 522
Token resolution: reads NOVA_GITEA_TOKEN (or ACDL_GITEA_TOKEN) from .env.secrets
/ .env, matching the ship_phase.sh pattern. Never uses shell env tokens.
"""
import os
import sys
import json
import urllib.request
import urllib.error
from pathlib import Path
GITEA_BASE = "https://git.cloudinit.dev"
OWNER = "continuous-intelligence"
REPO = "acdl"
def resolve_token() -> str:
for fn in (".env.secrets", ".env"):
try:
for line in Path(fn).read_text().splitlines():
if line.startswith("NOVA_GITEA_TOKEN=") or line.startswith("ACDL_GITEA_TOKEN="):
return line.split("=", 1)[1].strip()
except (FileNotFoundError, PermissionError):
continue
raise RuntimeError("No Gitea token found in .env.secrets or .env (NOVA_GITEA_TOKEN/ACDL_GITEA_TOKEN)")
def attach_asset(file_path: str, release_id: str) -> dict:
token = resolve_token()
p = Path(file_path)
if not p.is_file():
raise FileNotFoundError(f"Asset file not found: {file_path}")
url = f"{GITEA_BASE}/api/v1/repos/{OWNER}/{REPO}/releases/{release_id}/assets"
filename = p.name
boundary = "----NovaBoundary7MAgYbk"
body = (
f"--{boundary}\r\n"
f'Content-Disposition: form-data; name="name"\r\n\r\n'
f"{filename}\r\n"
f"--{boundary}\r\n"
f'Content-Disposition: form-data; name="attachment"; filename="{filename}"\r\n'
f"Content-Type: application/octet-stream\r\n\r\n"
).encode() + p.read_bytes() + f"\r\n--{boundary}--\r\n".encode()
req = urllib.request.Request(
url,
data=body,
headers={
"Authorization": f"token {token}",
"Content-Type": f"multipart/form-data; boundary={boundary}",
},
method="POST",
)
try:
resp = urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=60)
return json.loads(resp.read())
except urllib.error.HTTPError as e:
err = e.read().decode()[:300]
raise RuntimeError(f"HTTP {e.code} attaching {filename} to release {release_id}: {err}") from e
if __name__ == "__main__":
if len(sys.argv) != 3:
print("Usage: attach_release_asset.py <file-path> <release-id>")
sys.exit(1)
result = attach_asset(sys.argv[1], sys.argv[2])
print(f"Attached: {result.get('name')} → release {sys.argv[2]} (asset id {result.get('id')})")
+56
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# scripts/render_deck.sh — render a Marp deck to HTML + PPTX, commit both to git.
# REQ-228 (v1.18): PPTX is now a first-class committed artifact + release attachment.
#
# Usage:
# bash scripts/render_deck.sh <deck-name>
# bash scripts/render_deck.sh nova-no-humans-platform
#
# Renders:
# docs/presentations/<deck-name>-marp.md → docs/presentations/<deck-name>.html (committed)
# → docs/presentations/<deck-name>.pptx (committed, binary)
#
# The PPTX is also attached to the current phase's Gitea release via
# scripts/attach_release_asset.py (call separately after ship, or this script
# will invoke it if NOVA_GITEA_RELEASE_ID is set).
set -euo pipefail
DECK="${1:?Usage: render_deck.sh <deck-name>}"
cd "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)"
SRC="docs/presentations/${DECK}-marp.md"
HTML="docs/presentations/${DECK}.html"
PPTX="docs/presentations/${DECK}.pptx"
if [ ! -f "$SRC" ]; then
echo "ERROR: source deck $SRC not found" >&2; exit 1
fi
CHROME=""
for c in \
/root/.cache/ms-playwright/chromium-1217/chrome-linux64/chrome \
/usr/bin/chromium \
/usr/bin/chromium-browser \
/usr/bin/google-chrome; do
if [ -x "$c" ]; then CHROME="$c"; break; fi
done
if [ -z "$CHROME" ]; then
echo "WARNING: no Chrome/Chromium found — skipping render (HTML/PPTX will need manual re-render)" >&2
exit 0
fi
export CHROME_PATH="$CHROME"
echo "Rendering HTML → $HTML"
npx --yes @marp-team/marp-cli@latest --allow-local-files "$SRC" -o "$HTML" 2>&1 | tail -3
echo "Rendering PPTX → $PPTX"
npx --yes @marp-team/marp-cli@latest --allow-local-files "$SRC" -o "$PPTX" 2>&1 | tail -3
git add "$HTML" "$PPTX"
echo "Staged $HTML + $PPTX for commit."
if [ -n "${NOVA_GITEA_RELEASE_ID:-}" ]; then
echo "Attaching PPTX to Gitea release $NOVA_GITEA_RELEASE_ID..."
python3 scripts/attach_release_asset.py "$PPTX" "$NOVA_GITEA_RELEASE_ID" || \
echo "WARNING: attach failed — PPTX is still committed; attach manually."
fi