# Praxis — Voice-first AI Apprenticeship Platform **Milestone:** v0.3 (Mastery scoring + competency rubrics) **Status:** phase 0 — specify (active milestone) **Autonomy:** full **Previous milestone:** v0.2 (Proxmox LXC deployment) — complete, tagged v0.1.2, release #377 ## Vision Praxis is a voice-first, AI-tutored skill platform for learners in resource-constrained environments. Instead of courses, videos, and quizzes, learners practice real job scenarios through real-time spoken conversation with AI tutors. The platform treats every learner as an apprentice to a master craftsperson — open the app, talk, do the job, get better at it. **One-line pitch:** Praxis turns every smartphone into a master craftsperson that talks to you, challenges you, and helps you get good at your job. ## Objective Build a voice-first AI apprenticeship platform where learners engage in spoken role-play scenarios with AI tutors, receive coaching debriefs, and progress via mastery gates — working on low-cost phones over constrained bandwidth. ## v0.3 Scope (Mastery Scoring + Competency Rubrics) v0.3 activates the mastery/assessment layer deferred from v0.1/v0.2 (per D-021, ROADMAP line 53). Learners progress via **mastery gates** — they move on only when they can do the thing across varied scenarios, scored against a competency rubric. v0.3 also introduces the multi-tenant + auth foundation required for the cohort dashboard, and a verifiable-credential issuer so mastery is portable. **v0.3 in scope (activated REQ groups — post-grill):** - **Mastery core (REQ-MAST-01, REQ-MAST-02):** competency rubric per skill; Mastery Score updated after each session, requiring varied-scenario success before a mastery gate opens - **Verifiable credentials (REQ-MAST-03):** portable, tamper-evident credentials issued on week-final mastery gate (W3C VC Data Model 2.0, Ed25519, **formative-tier**, SQLite-backed issuer keys, public verification endpoint) - **Dynamic difficulty (REQ-SCEN-02):** scenario difficulty adjusts to learner performance (item-response-theory-informed) - **Scenario library (REQ-SCEN-03, REQ-SCEN-04):** library tagged by skill/difficulty/failure_mode; expert-authored format extended with rubric mappings + AI-generated variation hooks - **Path structure (REQ-PATH-02):** path-as-job 6-week structure (PRD §6.4) — the progression container mastery gates live in **v0.3 out of scope (deferred to v0.4 per GRILL-v0.3.md Axis 2):** - **REQ-DASH-01 (cohort dashboard) + REQ-AUTH-01 (operator auth) + REQ-MT-01/02 (operator Postgres + aggregation) + 4 NFRs** — the operator tier was originally v0.8 on the ROADMAP; pulling it into v0.3 created a 2-milestone program. The grill's binding verdict splits it to v0.4. D-031 (override D-007) is deferred with the operator tier. - REQ-PATH-01 (full multi-path launch) — v0.3 ships the Customer Service path only - REQ-DASH-02 (full operator-suite dashboard) — later milestone - REQ-ASSIST-01..03 (Live Assist) — later milestone - REQ-LOWBW-01..03 (WhatsApp/USSD/offline) — later milestone - REQ-VOICE-05/06 (multi-language, persona switching) — later milestone - Active failure injection (D-009) — D-049 confirms stays off in v0.3 - Dynamic rubric weight re-weighting on branch outcome — static in v0.3 (grill Axis 9) - Traefik proxy / public TLS — deferred from v0.2 (R-AUTH-01 deferred to v0.4 with the operator surface) **Carries forward from v0.2 (already in production):** - Docker-in-LXC deployment (`lxc-deploy.sh`, `praxis.service`, `/health` :8789) - Voice loop (Deepgram Nova-3 + Cartesia + Pipecat + Ollama Cloud) - v0.1 scenario (`cs_refund_ca_v01.yaml`) + guardrails + debrief ## v0.2 Scope (Proxmox LXC Deployment — complete) v0.2 deploys praxis into a Proxmox LXC container, reusing and adapting the battle-tested deployment toolkit from `~/coreci/scripts/proxmox/`. The v0.1 voice loop becomes deployable infrastructure — a Docker image runs the Python/Pipecat server (serving the React client as static files) inside an LXC container on the operator's Proxmox cluster. **v0.2 in scope:** - Docker image (multi-stage: Node builds `client/dist`, Python runs `server` + serves dist via FastAPI StaticFiles) - `scripts/proxmox/` adapted from coreci (api.sh, lxc-deploy, lxc-clone, lxc-config, lxc-start, health-check, rollback, stage-snippet, firstboot-hook, timing) - `scripts/install-service.sh` (systemd unit for `docker compose up`) - Secret wiring: PROXMOX_* sourced from coreci's `.env.secrets`; GITEA_TOKEN + DEEPGRAM_API_KEY from praxis's secrets - Health-check adapted for `/health` :8789 (praxis's endpoint, not coreci's `/healthz` :18080) - E2E deploy verification against the live Proxmox cluster **v0.2 out of scope (deferred):** - Mastery scoring, competency rubrics (deferred to v0.3) - CARTESIA_API_KEY / OLLAMA_API_KEY provisioning (infrastructure-only; server degrades gracefully per v0.1 design) - Traefik proxy / public TLS (pilot = direct bridge IP access) - Multi-environment (dev/staging/prod) — single pilot CT - vmbr1 private network (pilot uses vmbr0 DHCP) ## Product Principles (non-negotiable) 1. **Voice is the primary interface.** Text is fallback, not default. 2. **Doing > Knowing.** Every session produces observable action, not passive consumption. 3. **One skill, one outcome.** Each path is a job someone can get. 4. **Works on a cheap phone, on 2G.** Engineering constraints are product features. 5. **The AI is a master, not a chatbot.** Personality, standards, opinions. 6. **Mastery gates progression.** Move on when you can do the thing. 7. **Failure is the curriculum.** AI provokes mistakes, then coaches recovery. ## Requirements (summary — see REQUIREMENTS.md for formal REQ-IDs) - Voice conversation engine: real-time ASR + streaming TTS, <600ms round-trip, interruptible, persona switching - Scenario engine: branching role-plays with failure-injection and dynamic difficulty (v0.1: one scenario) - Learner state: progress, session history, mastery accumulation (v0.3: mastery scoring + competency rubrics + verifiable credentials) - Scenario engine: branching role-plays with failure-injection and dynamic difficulty (v0.3: dynamic difficulty + scenario library + AI variations) - Skill paths: path-as-job 6-week structure (v0.3: Customer Service path structured + mastery gates) - Cohort dashboard: anonymized cohort view for training operators (v0.3: multi-tenant + auth + cohort view) - LLM foundation: Ollama-hosted open-weights models `gemma4:cloud` and `deepseek-v4-flash:cloud` - Low-bandwidth surfaces (later milestones) ## Constraints - C-1 Voice is primary interface; text is fallback only - C-2 Must work on $100 Android phone over 2G/3G - C-3 Cost ≤ $3/active learner/month (target markets; v0.1 is Canada launch — relaxed for pilot) - C-4 Audio-only in v1 (no large video assets) - C-5 Open-weights LLM via Ollama catalog — `gemma4:cloud` + `deepseek-v4-flash:cloud` - C-6 Domain safety guardrails + human-in-the-loop + disclaimers for safety-sensitive domains - C-7 Scenarios authored by domain experts + learning designers; AI generates variations only - C-8 Latency budget < 600ms end-to-end (ASR → LLM → TTS) ## Key Decisions | ID | Decision | Rationale | Confidence | Alternatives | |----|----------|-----------|------------|--------------| | D-001 | Launch market = **Canada** (path: Customer Service) | User-directed; Canada as initial market for v0.1 pilot. PRD named Kenya — overridden. | 0.70 | Kenya + Customer Service (PRD default) | | D-002 | Milestone = **v0.1 foundation** (v1.0 reserved for working/tested product) | User-directed; v0.1 is the foundation slice (Phase 0 + Phase 1 minimal voice loop). v1.0 is a future milestone. | 0.90 | v1.0 = Phase 0 + Phase 1 (too ambitious for first milestone) | | D-003 | LLM foundation = **Ollama catalog** — `gemma4:cloud` + `deepseek-v4-flash:cloud` | User-directed; open-weights via Ollama, two base models for edge/cloud split. Research phase to verify exact catalog IDs. | 0.75 | Llama-family, Mistral-family, Qwen-family | | D-004 | Defer monetization model decision to Phase 1 | PRD §11.5 explicitly lists this as a Phase 1 decision (B2C paid, B2B per-seat, donor-funded, government). | 0.85 | Decide now (insufficient data) | | D-005 | Single-project mode | Fresh repo with one project; no multi-project need. | 1.00 | Multi-project mode | | D-006 | "One persona" = one voice persona; scenario role-play uses the same TTS voice as mentor (no distinct character voice in v0.1) | Minimizes v0.1 surface area; PRD's full persona-switching (REQ-VOICE-06) is deferred. Same voice avoids a second TTS configuration to validate. | 0.70 | Two voices (mentor + character) — adds TTS config risk | | D-007 | "Single learner state" = local single hardcoded profile, no auth, no multi-tenant; persisted via SQLite on-device (or local file fallback) | v0.1 is a pilot harness, not a production multi-user system. Auth/multi-tenant is a later-milestone concern. SQLite chosen as the default local store; research phase may refine. | 0.80 | In-memory only (no persistence), server-side Postgres (premature) | | D-008 | Interruptibility = abort-and-yield (learner speech cuts AI TTS immediately, AI yields the floor, no pause/resume state machine in v0.1) | Matches real-conversation semantics per PRD §6.1; pause/resume adds state-machine complexity inappropriate for v0.1. | 0.75 | Pause/resume state machine | | D-009 | Failure-injection hook = architecturally present (scenario declares a `failure_mode` field) but NOT actively provoked in v0.1 sessions | v0.1 validates the data model and one scenario's success criteria; provoking failures is a coaching-debrief feature tied to mastery (deferred). Hook present so Phase 2+ can activate it without schema change. | 0.70 | Active failure injection in v0.1 (couples to deferred mastery engine) | | D-010 | v0.1 Canada Customer Service scenario = "Angry customer requesting refund on a damaged product" (retail context, single branch point) | Concrete, universally recognizable, low safety-risk (non-medical/non-electrical). One branch point (customer escalates vs accepts resolution) keeps scenario runtime minimal while exercising branching. | 0.65 | "Customer with wrong booking" (hospitality — less universal for Canada pilot) | | D-011 | Coaching debrief = included in v0.1 as a single end-of-session text+voice summary (not the full PRD §5.1 multi-moment replay) | The debrief is part of the core daily loop and cheap to include at a basic level. Full replay/multi-moment coaching is tied to mastery (deferred). | 0.70 | Exclude debrief entirely (loses core loop identity), full replay (over-scoped) | | D-012 | v0.1 cost ceiling = no enforced ceiling (pilot); architecture must not bake in assumptions that would prevent meeting ≤$3/learner/month post-pilot | C-3 is a target-market constraint. Canada pilot is a foundation/tech-validation milestone, not a unit-economics milestone. Logging actual cost per session is a v0.1 NFR to inform later milestones. | 0.85 | Enforce $3 ceiling in v0.1 (premature optimization, wrong market) | | D-013 | ASR = **Deepgram Nova-3** streaming (cloud, WebSocket) | Research-verified: streaming-native, ~200-300ms first partial, accent-robust for Canadian English, first-class Pipecat integration, Canada data-residency available. Fallback: Groq-hosted Whisper. | 0.85 | whisper.cpp (breaks <600ms budget), OpenAI Whisper API (batch) | | D-014 | TTS = **Cartesia Sonic** (cloud, ~120ms first audio) primary; **Piper** (self-hosted, ~80ms) fallback behind interface | Research-verified: Cartesia #1 on Speech Arena; Piper is open-weights post-pilot ≤$3/learner path. R4 risk: all-cloud path ~670ms — Piper local may be required for production v0.1 latency. | 0.80 | ElevenLabs (quality but higher latency/cost), Amazon Polly | | D-015 | Client = **React + WebRTC** via Pipecat client SDK | Research-verified: Pipecat ships React/RN/Swift/Kotlin SDKs; web client = fastest v0.1 iteration, no app-store distribution, upgrades to React Native for Android later. | 0.85 | Python CLI harness (dev-integration only), native Android Kotlin (premature) | | D-016 | Transport = **WebRTC** (UDP, sub-50ms audio); WebSocket dev fallback | Research-verified: WebRTC is Pipecat's production transport; adaptive bitrate, UDP. SSE/HTTP rejected (unidirectional/high overhead). | 0.85 | WebSocket-only (higher audio latency), custom raw HTTP/2 | | D-017 | Orchestration = **Pipecat** (not custom, not Vocode) | Research-verified: 13.8k★, active, integrates Deepgram+Cartesia+Piper+Ollama natively, has VAD/interrupt/Flows for branching. Vocode stale since Nov 2024. Custom orchestration rebuilds solved problems. | 0.85 | Vocode (stale), custom from scratch | | D-018 | Scenario format = **YAML DSL → Pydantic → Pipecat Flows** | Research-verified: YAML is human-authorable + diffable + supports comments (critical for learning-designer rationale per C-7); Pydantic gives typed runtime; Pipecat Flows consumes the schema for branching. JSON is wire format only. | 0.85 | JSON DSL (no comments), code-authored (couples authoring to engineering) | | D-019 | v0.1 guardrail layer = **pluggable interface** with Customer Service ruleset implementation | Research: v0.1 is low-risk (Customer Service) but architecture must support pluggable guardrails for later high-risk domains (health/electrical). Ruleset: no legal/financial/medical advice, no real-company employee impersonation, stay-in-role, session-start disclaimer audio, no PII beyond hardcoded profile. | 0.80 | No guardrails (violates C-6), hardcoded non-pluggable rules (blocks future domains) | | D-020 | LLM access = **Ollama Cloud direct API** (`https://ollama.com/api/chat` + `OLLAMA_API_KEY`) — no local daemon | Research-verified: `:cloud` tags are real Ollama hosted-inference on NVIDIA cloud partners. Direct API eliminates local-daemon deployment dependency. `gemma4:cloud` (256K ctx) → role-play fast path; `deepseek-v4-flash:cloud` (1M ctx, no-think mode) → debrief. Self-host `gemma4:e4b` is the post-pilot cost-reduction path. | 0.85 | Local Ollama daemon proxy mode (adds deployment dependency) | | D-021 | v0.2 scope = **Proxmox LXC deployment** (replaces roadmap's mastery-scoring v0.2) | User-directed: deploy praxis into an LXC container hosted on Proxmox, reusing `~/coreci/scripts/proxmox/` methods. Mastery scoring deferred to v0.3. | 0.95 | v0.2 = mastery scoring (original roadmap), v0.2 = LXC deploy + mastery (too large) | | D-022 | Artifact = **Docker image in LXC** (nesting=1) | User-directed. Isolates Python/Pipecat deps; coreci's clone script already sets `features=nesting=1`. Avoids venv/pip first-boot fragility (Pipecat has many native deps). Multi-stage build: Node stage produces `client/dist`, Python stage runs the server. | 0.85 | Clone repo + venv + pip (fragile first-boot), sdist tarball (needs build/release step) | | D-023 | Client serving = **FastAPI serves `client/dist` as StaticFiles** | User-directed. Single port (8789), simplest pilot — no nginx/caddy. The Docker image bundles the pre-built dist. | 0.90 | Separate static server (nginx/caddy — more moving parts), client out of scope | | D-024 | Voice-service keys = **infrastructure-only** for v0.2 | User-directed. Server starts and `/health` passes even without CARTESIA/OLLAMA keys (v0.1 graceful degradation). Keys provisioned in a later milestone. Only GITEA_TOKEN + DEEPGRAM_API_KEY are in `.env.secrets`. | 0.90 | Provision all keys in v0.2 (premature — deploy infra first) | | D-025 | Image distribution = **host-build → `pct push` tarball** (research decision, see RESEARCH.md) | The LXC CT may not route to the internet (coreci pattern: host-fetch → pct push). Build the Docker image on the PVE host (Docker available on Proxmox host) and `docker save | pct exec -- docker load`, or `pct push` a tarball. Avoids needing a container registry. | 0.75 | Gitea container registry (requires registry setup), Docker Hub (external dependency) | | D-026 | Proxmox secrets sourced from **`~/coreci/.ciagent/.env.secrets`** | Same Proxmox cluster, same operator. PROXMOX_API_URL/TOKEN/NODE/STORAGE/TEMPLATE_VOLID already provisioned there. Praxis's `.env.secrets` adds GITEA_TOKEN + DEEPGRAM_API_KEY. The deploy script sources both. | 0.90 | Duplicate proxmox secrets in praxis (drift risk) | | D-027 | VMID = **`auto`** (fresh allocation via `pve_nextid`) | CLARIFY auto-decide (full autonomy). Don't reuse coreci's fixed PROXMOX_LXC_VMID — praxis gets its own CT on the same cluster. | 0.95 | Reuse coreci's VMID (collision), hardcode a new fixed VMID (manual allocation) | | D-028 | Docker installed **inside the CT** via apt (CT has network via vmbr0 DHCP) | CLARIFY auto-decide. Avoids needing Docker on the PVE host. The debian-12 template + nesting=1 supports Docker-in-LXC. firstboot hook runs `pct exec` to install `docker.io` + `docker-compose-v2`. | 0.90 | Docker on PVE host (extra host dependency), pre-baked template (custom template maintenance) | | D-029 | Image built **inside the CT** (clone repo from Gitea, `docker build`, `docker compose up`) | CLARIFY auto-decide. Self-contained — CT fetches its own source + builds. No image transfer needed. Slower first-boot (~3-5 min for build) but simpler and reproducible. | 0.80 | Build on PVE host + pct push tarball (host Docker dependency), pre-built image from registry (external dependency) | | D-030 | CT network = **vmbr0 DHCP only** (pilot, no vmbr1, no Traefik proxy) | CLARIFY auto-decide. v0.2 is infrastructure-only pilot. Direct bridge IP access for health-check. Proxy/TLS deferred to a later milestone. | 0.90 | vmbr1 + Traefik proxy (over-scoped for pilot) | | D-031 | v0.3 introduces **multi-tenant + auth** — **overrides D-007** for the cohort-dashboard surface | REQ-DASH-01 (anonymized cohort view for training operators) requires multi-tenant data. D-007's single-learner/no-auth stance was correct for v0.1/v0.2 pilot but blocks v0.3's cohort dashboard. Resolution: **hybrid** — learner-local state stays SQLite-on-device (D-007 preserved for learner surface); a new **operator-tier Postgres** stores cohort aggregations + operator accounts + issued credentials. Learner auth deferred (single-learner-per-device still valid for pilot). Operator auth = session-based, single operator role in v0.3. Research phase to validate Postgres-in-LXC + migration path. | 0.75 | Full Postgres migration (abandons SQLite pilot work), defer DASH-01 again (scope creep), no auth (insecure) | | D-032 | Mastery gate = **N-of-M varied-scenario success + rubric score ≥ threshold** | Operationalizes PRD principle 6 ("move on when you can do the thing"). N=3 distinct scenarios, rubric mean ≥ 3.5/5.0 (configurable per path). Research phase to validate rubric model + threshold against competency-based-assessment literature. | 0.70 | Single-scenario pass (gaming risk), pure rubric score (no variety), pure time-on-task (invalid) | | D-033 | Verifiable credentials = **W3C VC Data Model 2.0, platform-issued** (operator key), Ed25519 signatures | Research-anticipated: W3C VC 2.0 is the current standard; platform-issued is simplest viable issuer model (no DID method proliferation); Ed25519 is compact + widely supported. Self-issued (learner-side key) rejected — no tamper-evidence authority. Third-party issuer (university/agency) deferred to v0.9 credentialing milestone. Revocation = simple status list (VC Status List v2025). | 0.70 | Self-issued (no authority), third-party issuer (v0.9 scope), JWT-VC (less mature tooling) | | D-034 | Cohort anonymization = **k-anonymity ≥ 10** + aggregation window ≥ 7 days | REQ-DASH-01 operator view must not expose individual learners. k=10 is the conventional minimum for anonymized analytics; 7-day aggregation prevents re-identification via sparse windows. Research phase to validate against differential-privacy literature. Operator sees aggregate progression/failure-patterns only. | 0.70 | No anonymization (privacy violation), differential privacy (over-engineered for v0.3 scale), k=5 (too weak) | | D-035 | Dynamic difficulty = **IRT-informed (1-parameter Rasch)**, updated per session | REQ-SCEN-02. Item Response Theory (1PL/Rasch) is the simplest well-grounded model: learner ability θ, scenario difficulty b, P(success)=logistic(θ−b). Bayesian update of θ after each session. Avoids 2PL/3PL complexity (discrimination/guessing params — needs more data than v0.3 has). Research phase to validate. | 0.70 | ELO-like (less theoretically grounded), fixed difficulty steps (no adaptation), 2PL/3PL (data-hungry) | | D-036 | Scenario library structure = **YAML directory + index manifest**, tagged by skill/difficulty/failure_mode/rubric | Extends D-018's YAML DSL. Library = `scenarios//.yaml` + `scenarios/index.yaml` manifest (tagged, versioned). Expert-authored scenarios ship as YAML; AI-generated variations use the same schema with a `generated_from` backref. Rubric mapping added to scenario schema (each scenario declares which rubric criteria it exercises). | 0.80 | Database-backed library (premature — YAML is diffable + authorable per C-7), JSON (no comments per D-018), inline in code (couples authoring to engineering) | | D-037 | Path structure = **6-week job-structured path**, JSON + YAML, mastery gates between weeks | REQ-PATH-02 (PRD §6.4). Path = `paths/.yaml` defining 6 weeks, each week = a set of scenarios + a mastery gate. Gate opens when D-032 mastery condition met. v0.3 ships the Customer Service path fully (6 weeks) with ≥1 scenario per week (library REQ-SCEN-03 fills the rest). | 0.75 | Free-form progression (no structure), 12-week (too long for pilot), week-as-fixed-time (relax to mastery-paced) | | D-038 | Rubric scoring path = **rule-based final score, LLM-assisted criterion extraction only** (REQ-NFR-MAST-01) | Final score must be deterministic. LLM (deepseek-v4-flash:cloud no_think) extracts criterion evidence from session turns (which utterance maps to which rubric criterion); a rule function computes the 1-5 score per criterion from the extracted evidence + branch outcome. No LLM in the numeric scoring step. Preserves REQ-NFR-MAST-01 determinism + keeps latency off the voice path. | 0.80 | Pure-LLM scoring (non-deterministic, violates NFR-MAST-01), pure-rule extraction (rigid — can't handle free-form speech) | | D-039 | Rubric YAML format = **`rubrics/.yaml`** with criteria, 5-level anchors, per-skill weights | Extends D-018's YAML-everywhere stance. One rubric file per skill (v0.3: `rubrics/customer_service.yaml`). Each criterion has id, name, 5 anchored levels (1=fail … 5=mastery), weight. Scenario YAML maps to rubric criteria via `rubric_criteria` field (D-036). | 0.80 | JSON (no comments per D-018), inline in scenario (couples rubric to scenario — rubric is per-skill not per-scenario), DB-backed (premature) | | D-040 | Operator Postgres deployment = **second Docker service in the existing LXC CT** (`docker-compose.yml` adds `postgres` service) | REQ-NFR-MT-01. Reuses v0.2's LXC + Docker-in-LXC. No new CT, no host Postgres. Postgres 16, persistent volume, internal Docker network only (not exposed to bridge). Operator auth + cohort API + VC issuer connect to it. | 0.80 | Separate CT (over-provisioned for v0.3 scale), host Postgres (PVE host dependency), SQLite for operator (cohort aggregation needs relational + k-anonymity queries — SQLite workable but Postgres is the safer default) | | D-041 | Operator auth = **session-cookie, argon2id passwords, single `operator` role, login rate-limited (5 attempts/min)** | REQ-NFR-AUTH-01. Simplest viable auth for v0.3's single operator role. No OAuth/JWT complexity for one role. Cookie: httpOnly, secure, SameSite=Strict, 8h expiry. Rate limit via in-memory counter (single-instance). RBAC deferred (one role). | 0.75 | JWT (over-engineered for server-side session), OAuth (no IdP yet), basic-auth (insecure), no rate-limit (brute-force risk) | | D-042 | VC issuer key = **Ed25519 keypair in operator-tier secrets (`PRAXIS_VC_ISSUER_KEY`), generated on first issuer init, not committed** | REQ-NFR-VC-01. Key generated at first boot if absent, stored in Postgres `issuer_keys` table encrypted at rest with a root key from secrets. Verification endpoint serves the public key. Rotation = new key + old key marked superseded (not revoked — old VCs still verify against archived public key). | 0.70 | RSA (larger, slower), KMS-managed (no KMS in LXC), self-signed cert chain (X.509 complexity unjustified for one issuer) | | D-043 | VC verification endpoint = **public, unauthenticated, GET `/vc/verify/`** | Third parties (employers/agencies) verify credentials without an account. Returns `{valid: bool, status: "active"\|"revoked", issuer: "praxis-v0.3", mastery: {...}}`. No PII in the verification response beyond what the credential itself asserts. | 0.80 | Authenticated verification (friction for employers), no public endpoint (credentials not portable), returns full learner PII (privacy violation) | | D-044 | Cohort dashboard UI = **React route under `/operator/*`, served by the same FastAPI server (new prefix), reuses v0.2 StaticFiles** | REQ-DASH-01. Frontend-engineer reactivates (PERSONAS.md). Adds `/operator` React route + `/api/operator/*` FastAPI endpoints. Auth gate in React + server-side session check. No separate SPA build — same `client/dist`. | 0.75 | Separate operator SPA (extra build pipeline), server-rendered HTML (abandons React investment), no UI (operator reads JSON — not a product) | | D-045 | Cohort aggregation trigger = **on-session-end hook + nightly reconciliation job** | REQ-MT-02. Hook fires after `end_session()` → writes k-anonymized aggregate to Postgres (incremental). Nightly job (cron in the praxis service) reconciles + recomputes 7-day windows. Hybrid: low-latency updates + correctness guarantee. | 0.70 | Pure real-time (race-prone), pure nightly (stale, violates NFR-DASH-02 if job lags), CDC/streaming (over-engineered) | | D-046 | IRT θ persistence = **in learner-local SQLite** (`learner_ability` table: learner_id, path, theta, updated_at) | REQ-NFR-IRT-01. θ is per-learner-per-path, computed in-process on session end, no LLM call. Stays in SQLite with the rest of learner state (D-007 preserved). Cohort dashboard sees only k-anonymized aggregates of θ, never raw θ. | 0.80 | Postgres (couples learner state to operator tier — violates D-031 hybrid), in-memory (lost on restart), file-based JSON (no queryability) | | D-047 | Scenario library minimum for v0.3 = **≥6 expert-authored Customer Service scenarios** (one per path week) + **AI-generated variations gated by expert review** | REQ-SCEN-03/04. 6 scenarios give the mastery gate's N=3 varied-scenario condition room (D-032) without being so few that mastery is gameable. AI variations: LLM generates a variation from an expert scenario's schema with `generated_from` backref; expert reviews + approves before it enters the library. | 0.70 | 3 scenarios (mastery gate N=3 = exactly the minimum — no room for failure-retry variety), 12 scenarios (over-scoped for one milestone), no AI variations (loses REQ-SCEN-04) | | D-048 | Mastery gate open action = **advance learner to next path week + issue VC if week-final gate** | When D-032 condition met for a week's scenarios: learner `progress.current_week` advances. If the gate is the final week's gate, a VC is issued (REQ-MAST-03) asserting mastery of the path. Mid-path gates: no VC, just advancement. VCs are path-level, not week-level. | 0.75 | VC per week (credential spam — devalues the credential), no advancement (mastery gate is decorative), manual advancement (violates autonomy) | | D-049 | v0.3 activation of D-009 failure-injection = **NO** — failure-injection stays architecturally present but not provoked in v0.3 | D-009 hook stays in the schema. v0.3 mastery scoring scores *recovery* from naturally-occurring failure branches (the `escalate` branch in cs_refund_ca_v01), not AI-provoked failures. Active failure injection couples to a "failure-recovery coaching" feature that's a later milestone. v0.3 RESEARCH confirms this — no new failure-injection scenarios authored. | 0.80 | Activate failure injection in v0.3 (couples mastery scoring to a new feature — scope creep), remove the hook (breaks forward compat) | ### Confidence updates from research | ID | Before | After | Reason | |----|--------|-------|--------| | D-003 | 0.75 | **0.95** | Both Ollama model IDs verified in catalog as real, current, cloud-hosted tags | | D-007 | 0.80 | **0.90** | SQLite confirmed appropriate for v0.1 single-learner scale; no evidence favors alternatives | ## Target Users (v0.3: Canada pilot — Customer Service path) | Persona | Description | Pain | |---------|-------------|------| | Aspiring Adebayo → "Aspiring Alex" | 19–28, Canada. Recent secondary school grad. Smartphone, limited data. Wants a service job. | Can't afford vocational school. Needs to actually do the job. | | Upskilling Ursula → "Upskilling Uma" | 25–40, Canada. Retail, hospitality, healthcare. Wants promotion/new role. | No time for courses. Learns on the job. | | Frontline Felix | Customer service / sales / field tech agent, hired recently. | Manager has no time to coach. Wants quick on-shift practice. | ## Success Metrics (Year-1 targets, post-v0.1) | Metric | Target | Why | |--------|--------|-----| | Active weekly learners | 100k | Engagement, not downloads | | Sessions per learner / week | ≥5 | Habit formation | | Mastery rate per path | ≥40% completion | Real learning | | Median session length | 6–10 min | On-the-go use | | Cost / active learner / month | ≤$3 | Sustainable | | Reported job/promotion outcome | ≥25% | North star | | NPS (learner) | ≥50 | Word-of-mouth growth | ## Open Questions (for research/clarify phases) 1. Will learners talk to their phone in public? (earbuds + "no one will know" framing) 2. How to certify mastery credibly? (employer/agency recognition) 3. Domain safety minimum HITL for health/electrical scenarios 4. Voice cloning / impersonation disclosure 5. Monetization model (deferred to Phase 1) 6. Skills that should remain out of scope ## References - PRD v0.1 (this document's source) - ARCHITECTURE.md — system architecture - ROADMAP.md — phase breakdown - REQUIREMENTS.md — formal requirements with REQ-IDs